Are Drew Peterson and Scott Peterson Related?

The question “Are Drew Peterson and Scott Peterson related?” has intrigued true crime followers since both cases captured national headlines. While sharing the same last name, these two men became infamous for separate criminal cases involving their wives. Drew Peterson, a former police sergeant from Bolingbrook, Illinois, was convicted in 2012 for murdering his third wife and sentenced to 38 years in prison.
In fact, he received an additional 40-year sentence in 2015 for attempting to arrange the murder of prosecutor James Glasgow. Although their cases often draw comparisons, Scott Peterson’s story unfolded differently, leading to his 2004 conviction for the murder of his pregnant wife, Laci Peterson.
The media coverage of both cases, including a Lifetime movie about Drew Peterson titled “Drew Peterson: Untouchable,” has contributed to public confusion about their potential connection. These two separate but equally disturbing cases have left an indelible mark on true crime history, prompting many to question whether there might be more than just a shared surname between them.
Contents
The Media Confusion Behind Drew and Scott Peterson
Media coverage has played a significant role in creating confusion about whether Drew Peterson and Scott Peterson are related. The extensive reporting of both cases has led to widespread public speculation about a potential family connection between these two notorious figures.
Why People Think Drew Peterson and Scott Peterson are Related
Social media discussions frequently draw parallels between these cases, with many users questioning if there’s more than just a shared surname. The confusion stems primarily from the similar nature of their crimes and the timing of media coverage. Morning network news carried 84% of high-profile crime stories, consequently saturating viewers with coverage of both Peterson cases.
How News Coverage Created Confusion
The media’s approach to covering these cases significantly contributed to public misconception. Network news coverage of high-profile crimes, specifically the Scott Peterson case, showed distinct patterns compared to other major stories. Furthermore, these stories frequently relied on single viewpoints and anonymous sources, creating a narrative that sometimes blurred the lines between separate cases.
The intensity of media coverage reached unprecedented levels. Specifically, when Scott Peterson’s case unfolded, it triggered a media frenzy that intensified after the revelation of his relationship with Amber Frey. Similarly, Drew Peterson first received national attention in 2007 when his fourth wife disappeared.
Key differences in media coverage include:
- Scott Peterson’s case dominated headlines in 2004-2005
- Drew Peterson’s case gained prominence in 2007
- Different jurisdictions and investigating agencies
- Separate timelines and circumstances
The media sensationalism surrounding both cases has had lasting effects on true crime coverage. Notably, the extensive coverage raised questions about fair trials in high-profile cases. The Peterson cases exemplify how media attention can shape public perception, sometimes leading to misconceptions about unrelated criminal cases that share similar elements.
Who is Drew Peterson?
Former Bolingbrook police sergeant Drew Peterson’s path from decorated officer to convicted murderer showcases how are Drew Peterson and Scott Peterson related became a compelling question in true crime circles.
Career as a police officer
Initially joining the Bolingbrook Police Department in 1977 after serving in the Army, Drew Peterson rapidly advanced through the ranks. His career achievements include:
- Assignment to Metropolitan Narcotics Squad in 1978
- “Police Officer of the Year” award in 1979
- Promotion to sergeant
- USD 79,000 annual pension upon retirement
Moreover, his career faced controversy when he was temporarily fired and demoted for misconduct during his undercover work. Subsequently, Peterson retired in November 2007 at age 53, shortly before his life would take a dramatic turn.
Marriage history
Throughout his career, Drew Peterson’s personal life became increasingly complex. His first marriage to Carol Brown lasted from 1974 to 1980, ending after she discovered his infidelity. Following this, Peterson married Victoria Connolly in 1982, operating a bar together in Romeoville.
His third marriage to Kathleen Savio in 1992 ended tragically. Between 2002 and 2004, authorities responded to 18 domestic disturbance calls at their residence. Presently, Peterson serves time for Savio’s murder, making many wonder is Scott Peterson is related to Drew Peterson.
His fourth marriage to 19-year-old Stacy Peterson in 2003 added another layer to the question of are Scott Peterson and drew Peterson related, particularly after her mysterious disappearance in 2007.
Current status
At age 70, Drew Peterson continues serving his combined 78-year sentence. His conviction includes 38 years for Savio’s murder and an additional 40 years for attempting to arrange a hit on prosecutor James Glasgow.
Recently, Peterson filed for a new trial, claiming his former attorney Joel Brodsky prevented him from testifying in his defense. Additionally, he underwent a mental health evaluation, though results remain pending. Scott and Drew Peterson cases continue to draw attention as Peterson remains the prime suspect in Stacy’s disappearance, though he maintains his innocence in both cases.
Who is Scott Peterson?

Born on October 24, 1972, in San Diego, California, Scott Peterson’s story adds another layer to the question of are Drew Peterson and Scott Peterson related. As the only child of Lee and Jackie Peterson, Scott grew up in a San Diego suburb, where his father owned a crate-packaging business and his mother ran a boutique called The Put On.
Early life
Scott’s early years painted a picture of promise and potential. Indeed, as a model student and avid golfer, he attended the University of San Diego High School before enrolling at Arizona State University on a partial golf scholarship. Eventually, after a semester at Arizona State, he transferred to Cuesta College in San Luis Obispo, thereafter completing his agricultural business degree at California Polytechnic State University in 1994.
Marriage to Laci
The question of Scott and Drew Peterson takes an interesting turn when examining Scott’s relationship with Laci Rocha. Their paths crossed at Cal Poly, where Scott worked as a waiter at Pacific Café. Rather remarkably, Laci made the first move by giving Scott her phone number, telling her mother she had met the man she would marry.
After dating for two years, they married in 1997 at Sycamore Mineral Springs Resort. Soon after their wedding, the couple opened a burger restaurant called The Shack. The business proved profitable, and they later sold it to move to Modesto, approximately 90 miles east of San Francisco, to be closer to Laci’s family.
The infamous case
As many wonder are Drew Peterson and Scott Peterson related, the case that brought Scott notoriety unfolded in 2002. His wife Laci, then 27 and eight months pregnant with their son they planned to name Conner, disappeared on Christmas Eve. Certainly, Scott told police he had gone fishing at Berkeley Marina, about 90 miles from their home.
The investigation took a dramatic turn when authorities discovered:
- Multiple cell phones in Scott’s possession
- USD 15,000 in cash
- His brother’s ID
- Dyed blonde hair and a goatee at the time of arrest
On April 14, 2003, Laci’s body and their unborn son’s remains washed up on the shores of San Francisco Bay, near Berkeley Marina. Therefore, on April 18, police arrested 30-year-old Scott. The prosecution charged him with two counts of capital murder, primarily focusing on his affair with Amber Frey as motivation. Obviously, after a five-month trial, the jury convicted Scott of first-degree murder for Laci’s death and second-degree murder for their unborn son.
Separating Two Infamous Cases
Despite sharing a surname, the cases of are Drew Peterson and Scott Peterson related showcase distinct timelines and characteristics that set them apart. Let’s dive into the details that make each case unique.
Timeline differences
Primarily, the Scott Peterson case unfolded between December 2002 and November 2004, when he was found guilty of first-degree murder for Laci’s death and second-degree murder for their unborn child. Nonetheless, Drew Peterson’s legal troubles began in 2004 with the death of his third wife, Kathleen Savio, though suspicions didn’t arise until 2007 when his fourth wife disappeared.
The question of Scott and Drew Peterson becomes clearer when examining their case progressions:
- Scott Peterson’s case moved swiftly from Laci’s disappearance to conviction within two years
- Drew Peterson’s investigation spanned multiple years, with his conviction coming in 2012
- Scott Peterson’s appeals continue through 2024 with the Los Angeles Innocence Project
- Drew Peterson received an additional 40-year sentence in 2016 for attempting to arrange a prosecutor’s murder
Case characteristics
Notwithstanding their shared surname, Drew and Scott Peterson cases differ significantly in evidence and investigation methods. The Scott Peterson investigation focused heavily on circumstantial evidence, with prosecutors never presenting a murder weapon. Simultaneously, Drew Peterson case involved multiple investigations, including the reexamination of Savio’s death after initially being ruled accidental.
The question “is Scott Peterson related to Drew Peterson” becomes even more intriguing when examining key differences in their cases. Accordingly, Scott Peterson’s case centered around the discovery of Laci’s body in San Francisco Bay, whereas Drew Peterson’s conviction stemmed from forensic evidence showing Savio’s death was staged to look like an accident.
Straightaway, the investigation methods differed:
Scott Peterson’s case featured:
- Multiple cell phones and cash at arrest
- Evidence from Berkeley Marina
- Testimony from girlfriend Amber Frey
Are Scott Peterson and Drew Peterson related becomes clearer when examining Drew Peterson’s case characteristics:
- Reopened investigation after fourth wife’s disappearance
- Evidence from bathtub scene
- Testimony from pastor Neil Schori
Undeniably, while both cases garnered national attention, their investigations followed distinctly different paths. The Scott Peterson case relied heavily on circumstantial evidence and witness testimony, while Drew Peterson’s conviction came after new forensic evidence emerged during a second autopsy.
Impact on True Crime Coverage

The unprecedented media coverage of both cases asking are Drew Peterson and Scott Peterson related fundamentally changed how networks approach true crime reporting. The transformation of these cases into national spectacles reshaped television coverage and public discourse around criminal investigations.
Media sensationalism
Cable television’s appetite for sensational coverage reached new heights with these cases. The Scott Peterson trial alone attracted more than 900 credentialed journalists, marking the largest media gathering for a homicide case in California history. Primarily, morning network shows carried 84% of high-profile crime coverage, turning both cases into daily television events.
The media frenzy included:
- Constant updates on morning shows like ‘Good Morning America’ and ‘Today’
- Multiple daily newspaper editions
- Extensive tabloid coverage
- Round-the-clock cable news analysis
Public perception
As many wondered Scott and Drew Peterson connection, the public formed strong emotional bonds with these cases. Markedly, viewers developed deep connections to the victims, especially Laci Peterson and her unborn child. The question of Drew and Scott Peterson captivated audiences, with both cases becoming what one reporter called “a whodunit novel”.
The intense coverage of scott peterson case essentially transformed how people consumed true crime content. Alternatively, drew peterson saga played out across daytime talk shows and even inspired a made-for-cable movie starring Rob Lowe. Overall, these cases demonstrated the public’s growing appetite for true crime content.
Legal implications
The question “is Scott Peterson related to Drew Peterson” highlights how media coverage can affect legal proceedings. Generally, the extensive publicity raised concerns about fair trials, with defense attorneys arguing that media scrutiny influenced jury pools. The coverage of scott peterson and drew Peterson-related prompted discussions about the balance between public interest and judicial fairness.
The impact on the justice system manifested in several ways. The Peterson trials demonstrated how media attention could shape witness testimony and jury selection. The cases also influenced how courts handle high-profile trials, leading to new considerations about venue changes and jury selection processes. These developments continue to affect how the legal system manages cases under intense media scrutiny.
Are Drew Peterson And Scott Peterson Related Frequently Asked Questions
No, Drew Peterson and Scott Peterson are not related. They share the same last name and both were convicted of murdering their wives, but they have no familial connection. Their cases occurred at different times and in different locations.
What is the current status of Scott Peterson’s case?
Scott Peterson is currently serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole. His death sentence was overturned in 2020, and he was resentenced in 2021. As of 2024, the Los Angeles Innocence Project is pursuing appeals on his behalf.
Was Drew Peterson’s fourth wife ever found?
No, Drew Peterson’s fourth wife, Stacy Peterson, has never been found. She disappeared in 2007, and while Drew Peterson remains the prime suspect in her disappearance, he has not been charged in that case.
How did media coverage impact these cases?
The media coverage of both Drew Peterson and Scott Peterson cases was extensive and sensationalized. It transformed how true crime stories are reported, raising concerns about fair trials and influencing public perception. The coverage also led to discussions about balancing public interest with judicial fairness.
What were the key differences between the two cases?
The Scott Peterson case focused on circumstantial evidence and moved swiftly from Laci’s disappearance to conviction within two years. In contrast, Drew Peterson’s case spanned multiple years and involved the reopening of a previous investigation. Scott’s case centered on the discovery of Laci’s body, while Drew’s conviction stemmed from forensic evidence showing his third wife’s death was staged.